The answer is: Annas

John 18:13 - Although in Matthew's gospel record it is said that he was led away to Caiaphas, John gives us a little extra information. Annas for whatever reason was still recognised as a high priest (see Luke 3:2)

When you dive into the story of Jesus's trial, it can feel a bit like a historical whodunit involving a cast of complex characters and overlapping roles. Annas, who held court as the high priest during Jesus's arrest, is one such intriguing figure. Though no longer officially in charge, he still wielded immense influence, retaining an esteemed status in Jewish society.

Fun fact: Annas was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, the current high priest. It’s a sort of family affair, isn’t it? This connection adds layers to the drama surrounding Jesus's arrest and trial. When John mentions Annas first, it may remind you that this wasn’t merely a trial about religious law but a significant power struggle among religious authorities of the time.

Matthew’s gospel emphasizes Caiaphas, almost as if to spotlight the authoritative religious apparatus trying to keep control. Still, the choice to bring Jesus to Annas highlights a keen insight into the historical tensions at play—where the influence of a former leader couldn’t quite be shaken, reflecting the ever-present tension in leadership roles.

Moreover, in times of turmoil, the high priests were supposed to be spiritual leaders capable of discerning divine will. It’s noteworthy that, even in questioning Jesus, this intriguing back-and-forth suggests a deeper philosophical and moral dialogue—that undercurrents of faith are always influencing relationships and decisions in moments of crisis. There's something timeless about these dynamics that invites reflection on how authority and wisdom interact even today!